Picture this: You're in a hiring debrief, and the executive team is discussing a strong candidate. They have the right skills, experience, and qualifications. But then the conversation takes a turn.
🚩 "I don't know… I just don't see them fitting in with our culture."
🚩 "They seemed qualified, but I'm not sure I'd want to grab a beer with them."
🚩 "Their demeanor felt a little off—do we think they'll mesh well with the team?"
No mention of their ability to do the job, solve complex problems, or contribute to business growth—just gut-feel reactions rooted in personal comfort and social compatibility. It's an all-too-common scenario, and it's holding companies back. Subjective hiring decisions—especially those relying on "culture fit" as a vague, unstructured qualifier—introduce bias, weaken teams, and lead to missed opportunities for great hires. So, how do you help leaders move beyond outdated hiring practices and toward a more effective, structured approach without making them defensive?
Let's break it down.
Leaders are often unaware that their hiring approach is problematic. The key to influencing change is framing the conversation around business impact, not personal accusations.
Executives are busy. They don't want to hear that they're doing it wrong—but they will listen if you show how outdated hiring hurts the business. Conversations that are most effective position the conversation around these key risks:
💡 How to Say It:
"I noticed that some of our recent hiring discussions focused on things like 'culture fit' and personal demeanor. While we all want strong teams, these approaches can introduce unintentional bias and lead to weaker hires. Can we talk about how we define success in hiring to ensure we're getting the best people for the job?"
One of the most common outdated hiring mindsets is "culture fit." Leaders often say it with good intentions—they want team cohesion—but culture fit often becomes a proxy for personal bias. Instead of evaluating whether a candidate "fits in" socially, focus on their cultural add—how their skills, experience, and perspectives will enhance and diversify the team.
💡 How to Say It:
"Rather than asking if someone 'fits' into our existing culture, let's focus on how they add to it. As we interview, let's start assessing what new perspectives, skills, or approaches each candidate would bring and how these new qualities would strengthen the team."
Hiring shouldn't be based on gut feelings or individual preferences. It should be structured, fair, and designed to identify the best candidates for the job.
Here's what a structured hiring process includes:
✅ Clearly defined role expectations – What skills, experience, and competencies are truly needed?
✅ Standardized interview questions – Every candidate should be assessed on the same criteria, reducing bias.
✅ Skills-based evaluation – Instead of subjective assessments, test actual job-related capabilities.
💡 How to Say It:
"I'd love for us to explore how we can make our hiring process more structured—to do this, let's create a standardized interview approach that ensures we're evaluating candidates consistently across a variety of knowledge, skills, and behaviors that are critical for success in the role."
Many executives have never been formally trained in hiring best practices, and even those who have received training have outdated skills. That's not their fault—it is their responsibility to level up and close key gaps. Here's how to facilitate leaders self-educating and improving their hiring acumen:
Encourage leaders to level up on current best practices:
Tools like the Predictive Index (PI) can help leaders assess candidates objectively based on behavioral and cognitive strengths rather than gut feelings. These tools:
Sometimes, the best way to help leaders evolve is through external coaching and expert guidance. Hiring consultants and executive coaches can help leadership:
💡 How to Say It:
"Many companies, startup through scaled, use hiring tools to ensure their hiring process is data-driven and objective. Would you be open to exploring how we can integrate a more structured, science-backed approach to hiring?"
The hiring process needs to be documented and standardized for change to be sustainable. A hiring playbook helps ensure that every new hire is evaluated fairly and consistently.
A quality hiring playbook includes:
✅ Competency-based interview questions for each role.
✅ Scorecards for rating candidates objectively.
✅ Diversity and inclusion principles to ensure equitable hiring.
💡 How to Say It:
"I'd love to create a hiring playbook that aligns everyone on best practices, so hiring isn't dependent on personal preferences but a clear, structured approach."
Hiring is one of the most important and challenging responsibilities leaders face. Relying on outdated, unstructured hiring processes makes it even harder. The good news is that executives don't need to figure it all out alone. By shifting to structured, skills-based hiring, leaders can build stronger teams, reduce bias, and create a more successful company.
💡 Your Next Step:
Get buy-in and start with one small change. Whether the change is introducing structured interviews, leveraging hiring insight tools, or bringing in a hiring expert, small steps can significantly improve hiring quality.
If you are looking for expert coaching on hiring practices and navigating the challenges of other team dynamics, let's connect. The best leaders invest in growth—and that includes hiring smarter.